Fashion for women’s clothing, as well as the story develops in cycles. Everything is new – is well forgotten old, and reinterpret the opponent’s cut and design is always easier than to come up with your own. But sometimes the designers of women’s clothing just do not notice how pass the invisible line that separates the banal theft of “relying on the creative legacy of” legends of the world of high fashion.
Plagiarism in the fashion world appeared at the same time, and when the first designer – in the middle of the XVIII century, thanks to the achievements of the industrial revolution and automation of work that changed the production of clothing.
Today, such mass-market giants like Zara copied haute couture brands have almost everything – from the shapes and colors to the smallest detail of sewing technology. Hawaiian print, which appeared only at the Prada spring-summer of this year, already massively replicated thanks to the efforts ushlyh Spaniards. However, this affects even the model home with a worldwide reputation. So Margarita Missoni chided Michael Kors is that he is in his new collection of clothes used for integral Missoni zigzag pattern.
One way or another, but we are doomed to regularly monitor virtually identical in style and shape of women’s clothes of different brands. This is easily explained by the fact that they are inspired by the same people and events, and often buy fabric from the same manufacturer. True, it is difficult to distinguish between a situation of this kind of overt and blatant plagiarism.
Valentino, Marc Jacobs and many other famous designers have long been desperate to get justice through the courts. The legislation in many countries considers all wardrobe items utilitarian nature of things, and thus only indirectly indulges firmam- “pirates” like Zara and Primark. Those in his defense say they do not go down to the banal stirring by labels and creatively recycle best seen on the catwalks of the world.